Could Apple Be As Ruthless Without Steve?

by Chris Howard Feb 26, 2009

Steve Jobs' most defining trait is probably his ruthlessness on technology and willingness to can it before its end-of-life. This ruthlessness is a major factor in Apple's success since his return. Could anyone else in the role of Apple CEO have the necessary ruthlessness and yet still be visionary?

I totally expect Steve Jobs to return in June as expected. I also expect him to come back totally reinvigorated. But his absence gives us a chance to stop and think of Apple without him.

Without Mr Jobs at the helm, Apple has shown it's not afraid to experiment. On his return in 1997, he cut back many things, culled and streamlined product lines, and then to many peoples' surprise, culled perfectly good technology as well.

The one that everyone mentions is the floppy drive. The original iMacs came sans floppy drive. Apple said we didn't need them, we could email files. That wasn't entirely unreasonable if you remember that Mac floppies weren't PC compatible. However, the floppy lived a long time beyond that, and in fact, I still see them on the shelves.

Steve wasn't afraid to bet on new technologies either, with those original iMacs being among the first computers to come standard with USB and Firewire. However, as Firewire never really took off like USB has, Apple under Steve culled it from iPods years ago, and from MacBooks last year.

Speaking of culling, although Steve launched the Mac Cube with much fanfare, he had no hesitation in killing it off when it struggled.

What about the iPod? For years people begged Apple to include an FM radio. It never did, the closest being an add-on.

Software wise, iMovie springs to mind. A venerable application, well loved by millions, it was unceremoniously dumped in 2007 in favour of a completely new - and very feature lacking - version. Not unexpectedly, there was a huge uproar. In some minor concession, Apple made the old version available for download, but otherwise Apple, under Steve, stuck steadfastly to its new model. 2009 saw iMovie 09 released with many more features but still well short of the old iMovie 06.

Of course, we need look no further than the iPhone to see Apple's single mindedness. No MMS, no full Bluetooth, no video recording, three features that just about every other mobile phone has standard. But Apple, under Steve, sticks to its ways.

Throughout, Apple under Steve Jobs has been quite single minded in its vision for products. That has frustrated many people but the runs are on the board, the success is there.

Unlike those years without Steve when Apple tried to be all things, expanded its product lines, added new ones, even releasing its own digital camera - and was slowly going down the gurgler.

Could Apple find another leader with both Steve's product vision and commitment to an ideal? It's one thing to have a great idea etc, but if that means customers or potential customers offside, it can be hard to stick it out.

In this regard, where would Apple be if Steve doesn't come back, or when he does finally go? Would it drift more towards trying to keep more customers happy, trying to appeal to more people, broadening its product lines? Would we see headless Macs, rebirth of the Newton, netbooks, iPods with the lot, greatly cut down iPhones, and OS X licensing to name a few?

You may scoff, and say Apple has a culture, that its ruthlessness is in its culture, but it didn't take long last time Steve left for its culture to be forgotten.

Comments

  • This time around, Steve would be leaving on his own accord with a hand-picked successor.  So it’s much more likely that Apple will try and stay true to his philosophy and leadership of the company. 

    That said, this usually translates into a management style of “What would [our former iconic leader] do?” which has played out with mixed results in corporate history.

    Beeblebrox had this to say on Feb 26, 2009 Posts: 2220
  • There are those who lead while others follow. Apple has been the technology leader when Steve was at the helm. When he wasn’t the company floundered because it lacked leadership and vision. It tried to follow the PC in the world, in the 1990s, with boring beige PC looking boxes. Apple should never try again to become a computer commodity supplier like Dell.

    Being bold enough to see the future and not falling in love with your own stuff is the mark of a true leader. The switch to Intel when IBM could not make the Power PC processors faster, cooler and less power hungry was a bold move on the part of Steve. Apple is killing Firewire because consumer video is changing. New camcorders don’t need Firewire and can send the files to the Mac through USB. Steve saw this coming and is willing to dump Firewire on the consumer Mac books because the camcorder market has changed. Other computer manufacturers failed with their own retail stores because they did not understand that a store is not just a place to buy computer products. Steve took Apple into retail with great success because he saw the Apple store as a marketing and educational vehicle wrapped in a classy upscale venue. It’s a never ending ‘MacWorld’. Dell saw Apple’s success but didn’t understand the concept. They build retail stores where the customer could try their products, but couldn’t purchase one and take it home from the store.

    The next leaders at Apple have to have to guts to be at the cutting edge and to have the willingness to change with the times if company is going to prosper in the future. Steve is irreplaceable, the next leader has to be cut from the same cloth.

    Flyboybob had this to say on Feb 28, 2009 Posts: 33
  • Page 1 of 1 pages
You need log in, or register, in order to comment